This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Illiterate is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
The traditional definition of literacy is considered to be the ability to read and write, or the ability to use language to read, write, listen, and speak1. In modern contexts, the word refers to reading and writing at a level adequate for communication, or at a level that lets one understand and communicate ideas in a literate society, so as to take part in that society. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has drafted the following definition: "'Literacy' is the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute and use printed and written materials associated with varying contexts. Literacy involves a continuum of learning to enable an individual to achieve his or her goals, to develop his or her knowledge and potential, and to participate fully in the wider society."2 In modern times, illiteracy is seen as a social problem to be solved through education.
Contents |
World literacy rates
20% of the world population was illiterate in 1998 by the United Nations definition - the inability to read and write a simple sentence in any language.3 Using a definition of: "age 15 and over can read and write", the U.S. CIA World Factbook estimated in 2007 that the overall world literacy rate was 82%."4 East Asian and Latin American countries generally have illiteracy rates in the 10 to 15% region while developed countries have illiteracy rates of a few percent.
Literacy rates can vary widely from country to country or region to region. This often coincides with the region's wealth or urbanization, though many factors play a role, such as social customs in less developed countries which limit females from education.
Economics
Many policy analystswho? consider literacy rates a crucial measure of a region's human capital. This claim is made on the grounds that literate people can be trained less expensively than illiterate people, generally have a higher socio-economic status5 and enjoy better health and employment prospects. Policy makers also argue that literacy increases job opportunities and access to higher education. In Kerala, India, for example, female and child mortality rates declined dramatically in the 1960s, when girls who were educated in the education reforms after 1948 began to raise families. Recent researchers however, 6argue that correlations such as the one listed above may have more to do with the overall effects of schooling rather than literacy alone. In addition to the potential for literacy to increase wealth, wealth may promote literacy, through cultural norms and easier access to schools and tutoring services.citation needed
Broader and complementary definitions
Traditional definitions of literacy consider the ability to "read, write, spell, listen, and speak."7 Since the 1980s, some have argued that literacy is ideological, which means that literacy always exists in a context, in tandem with the values associated with that context.8 Prior work viewed literacy as existing autonomously. 9
Some have argued that the definition of literacy should be expanded. For example, in the United States, the National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association have added "visually representing" to the traditional list of competencies. Similarly, in Scotland, literacy has been defined as: "The ability to read and write and use numeracy, to handle information, to express ideas and opinions, to make decisions and solve problems, as family members, workers, citizens and lifelong learners."10
A basic literacy standard in many societies is the ability to read the newspaper. Increasingly, communication in commerce or society in general requires the ability to use computers and other digital technologies. 11 Since the 1990s, when the Internet came into wide use in the United States, some have asserted that the definition of literacy should include the ability to use tools such as web browsers, word processing programs, and text messages. Similar expanded skill sets have been called multimedia literacy, computer literacy, information literacy, and technacy.12
"Arts literacy" programs exist in some places in the United States,13 Australia, Canada, and Finland.citations needed
Other genres under study by academia include critical literacy, media literacy, and health literacy14
It is argued that literacy includes the cultural, political, and historical contexts of the community in which communication takes place.15
History
| This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (June 2007) |
| The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page. |
Although the history of literacy goes back several thousand years to the invention of writing, what constitutes literacy has changed throughout history. At one time, a literate person was one who could sign his or her name. At other times, literacy was measured only by the ability to read and write Latin (regardless of a person's ability to read or write his or her vernacular). Even earlier, literacy was a trade secret of professional scribes, and many historic monarchies maintained cadres of this profession, sometimes—as was the case for Imperial Aramaic—even importing them from lands where a completely alien language was spoken and written.
In the Middle Ages, literacy was measured by the ability to recite passages of scripture. In some societies, this skill was made available only to the clergy, and the ability to read and write might even have been seen as dangerous in the hands of less discerning groups. In medieval Europe, Jews consequently had an edge over the predominantly Christian population because many Jewish males received a basic (religious) education that enabled them to read, write and understand Hebrew, a skill that they also applied in secular life. This skill may be contrasted with the ability to "read" scripture, but—because it is not in the vernacular—not actually knowing what the text says.
In 12th and 13th century England, the ability to read a particular passage from the Bible entitled a common law defendant to the so-called benefit of clergy, which entitled a person to be tried before an ecclesiastical court, where sentences were more lenient, instead of a secular one, where hanging was a likely sentence. This opened the door to lay, but nonetheless literate, defendants also claiming the benefit of clergy, and—because the Biblical passage used for the literacy test was inevitably Psalm 51—an illiterate person who had memorized the appropriate verse could also claim the benefit of clergy.
By the mid-18th century, the ability to read and comprehend scripture (particularly when scripture was in the vernacular) led to Wales having one of the highest literacy rates. This was the result of a Griffith Jones's system of circulating schools, that aimed to enable everyone to read the Bible (in Welsh). Similarly, at least half the population of 18th century New England was literate, perhaps as a consequence of the Puritan belief in the importance of Bible reading. By the time of the American Revolution, literacy in New England is suggested to have been around 90 percent.
The ability to read did not necessarily imply the ability to write. The 1686 church law (kyrkolagen) of the Kingdom of Sweden (which at the time included all of modern Sweden, Finland, and Estonia) enforced literacy on the people and by the end of the 18th century, the ability to read was close to 100 percent. But as late as the 19th century, many Swedes, especially women, could not write.
Although the present-day concepts of literacy have much to do with the 15th century invention of the movable type printing press, it was not until the industrial revolution of the mid-19th century that paper and books became financially affordable to all classes of industrialized society. Until then, only a small percentage of the population were literate as only wealthy individuals and institutions could afford the prohibitively expensive materials. As late as 1841, 33% of all Englishmen and 44% of Englishwomen signed marriage certificates with their mark as they were unable to write (government-financed public education became available in England in 1870). Even today, the dearth of cheap paper and books is a barrier to universal literacy in some less-industrialized nations.
From another perspective, the historian Harvey Graff has argued that the introduction of mass schooling was in part an effort to control the type of literacy that the working class had access to. According to Graff, literacy learning was increasing outside of formal settings (such as schools) and this uncontrolled, potentially critical reading could lead to increased radicalization of the populace. In his view, mass schooling was meant to temper and control literacy, not spread it.
Literacy has also been used as a way to sort populations and control who has access to power. Because literacy permits learning and communication that oral and sign language alone cannot, illiteracy has been enforced in some places as a way of preventing unrest or revolution. During the Civil War era in the United States, white citizens in many areas banned teaching slaves to read or write presumably understanding the power of literacy. In the years following the Civil War, the ability to read and write was used to determine whether one had the right to vote. This effectively served to prevent former slaves from joining the electorate and maintained the status quo. In 1964, educator Paulo Freire was arrested, expelled, and exiled from his native Brazil because of his work in teaching Brazilian peasants to read.
Between 1500 and 1800, the approaches to reading changed as well. Briggs and Burke (2002) give examples of five types of reading changes 16
1 Critical reading
The increasing number of texts available, due to the printing press, allowed readers to compare and contrast varying opinions and accounts. Reading was not always critical: there is evidence to suggest that books were at times revered and were taken as an absolute truth.17
2 Dangerous reading
Private reading was at times viewed dangerous. It was argued that reading acted as a tranquiliser and was especially dangerous when practised by subordinate groups such as ‘common people’ or women. At the conclusion of the sixteenth-century, and later on, unsupervised reading was considered subversive by secular and theocratic authorities.
From the early sixteenth century onwards it was viewed as especially dangerous for women to read fiction. This notion originated from men who feared fiction for its potential to evoke dangerous emotions such as love.18
3 Creative reading
Creative reading is spawned by the prospect that texts can and are read in ways divergent to the author’s intentions. In a sixteenth century heresy trial an Italian miller, Menocchio, was questioned as to what books he read. The Inquisition was less concerned with what Menocchio actually read, and more in his interpretations of reading.19
4 Extensive reading
In the late eighteenth century a reading revolution of sorts was experienced. With a wide variety of sources available and an increasing literacy rate, books were consulted for information on specific topics. Consequently the practices of skimming, browsing and chapter hopping became prevalent.20
5 Private reading
Books changed in format to accommodate skimming and browsing. Books were broken down into chapters and further into paragraphs, with notes in the margins of the page to assist in the summarisation of sections of text. Features such as table of contents and indexes were also added to books to assist readers in locating specific information. Smaller books were introduced into the market that reflected the privatisation of reading. This shift in reading is directly associated with the rise of individualism; reflected in popular eighteenth century images of men and women reading alone, seemingly unaware of that around them.21
Attitudes toward literacy
In South Asia, attitudes toward literacy vary by social sector. Many see literacy as associated with schooling and not with everyday life, and some see greater prestige in relying on memorized texts than on being able to read. However, these ideas are slowly on the decline, as modern education diffuses into the region22
In much of Africa, literacy is associated with colonialism, whereas orality is associated with native traditions.23
Teaching literacy
Literacy comprises a number of subskills, including phonological awareness, decoding, fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary. Mastering each of these subskills is necessary for students to become proficient readers.24
Many children experience difficulty when learning to read. Learning to read is difficult because reading requires the mastery of a code that maps human speech sounds to written symbols. Mastering this code is not a natural process, like the development of language, and therefore requires instruction. Reading can be very difficult if students do not get good instruction in this code. 25
Readers of alphabetic languages must understand the alphabetic principle in order to master basic reading skills. A writing system is said to be alphabetic if it uses symbols to represent individual language sounds,26 though the degree of correspondence between letters and sounds varies across alphabetic languages. Syllabic writing systems (such as Japanese kana) use a symbol to represent a single syllable, and logographic writing systems (such as Chinese) use a symbol to represent a morpheme.
Phonics is an instructional technique that teaches readers to attend to the letters or groups of letters that make up words. A common method of teaching phonics is synthetic phonics, in which a novice reader pronounces each individual sound and "blends" them to pronounce the whole word. Another method of instruction is embedded phonics instruction, used more often in whole language reading instruction, in which novice readers learn a little about the individual letters in words, especially the consonants and the "short vowels." Teachers provide this knowledge opportunistically, in the context of stories that feature many instances of a particular letter. Embedded instruction combines letter-sound knowledge with the use of meaningful context to read new and difficult words.27
Criticism of the concept of teaching literacy
Sudbury model of democratic education schools assert that there are many ways to study and learn. They argue that learning is a process you do, not a process that is done to you; That is true of everyone. It's basic.28 The experience of Sudbury model democratic schools shows that there are many ways to learn without the intervention of teaching, to say, without the intervention of a teacher being imperative. In the case of reading for instance in the Sudbury model democratic schools some children learn from being read to, memorizing the stories and then ultimately reading them. Others learn from cereal boxes, others from games instructions, others from street signs. Some teach themselves letter sounds, others syllables, others whole words. Sudbury model democratic schools adduce that in their schools no one child has ever been forced, pushed, urged, cajoled, or bribed into learning how to read or write, and they have had no dyslexia. None of their graduates are real or functional illiterates, and no one who meets their older students could ever guess the age at which they first learned to read or write.2930 In a similar form students learn all the subjects, techniques and skills in these schools.
References
- ^ NCTE.org
- ^ UNESCO Education Sector, The Plurality of Literacy and its implications for Policies and Programs: Position Paper. Paris: United National Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2004, p. 13, citing a international expert meeting in June 2003 at UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136246e.pdf
- ^ Glossary, The Economist, http://www.economist.com/screensaver/glossary.cfm, retrieved on 14 November 2007
- ^ The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, November 1, 2007, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html, retrieved on 14 November 2007
- ^ PHONICS. It's Profitable, [www.thephonicspage.org The Phonics Page], http://www.thephonicspage.org/On%20Phonics/profitable.html, retrieved on 11 December 2007
- ^ Graff, 2003
- ^ Moats, L.C. Speech to Print: Language Essentials for Teachers, p. 3. Paul H. Brookes Co., 2000
- ^ Street, B. (1984) Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. New York: Cambridge University.
- ^ Curriculum Framework for Adult Literacy in Scotland (pdf)
- ^ Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey, OECD 2000. PDF
- ^ Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
- ^ Kennedy Center Partners in Education, Washington, D.C.; ABC school in South Carolina; A Plus schools in a half dozen states; Value Plus in Tennessee
- ^ Zarcadoolas, C., Pleasant, A., & Greer, D. (2006). Advancing health literacy: A framework for understanding and action. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
- ^ Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York: Lang; Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in Discourses. Philadelphia: Falmer.
- ^ Briggs, Asa and Burke, Peter (2002) A Social History of the Media: from Gutenberg to the Internet, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 61-67
- ^ Briggs and Burke (2002) p. 61.
- ^ Briggs and Burke (2002) pp. 61-62
- ^ Briggs and Burke (2002) pp. 62-64.
- ^ Briggs and Burke (2002) p. 64
- ^ Briggs and Burke (2002) pp. 64-66
- ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=bcuIz1M0AzQC&pg=PA87&sig=rD6pUisRFeozNYCrcHpBhhr5hB8
- ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=AIT-xLytIrkC&pg=PA69&sig=flx3W6cOpr03Ik2FEwV9EQOzcZA
- ^ National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000), Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups, U.S. Government Printing Office
- ^ Dr. Grover Whitehurst, Evidence Based Education Science and the Challenge of Learning to Read, http://www.childrenofthecode.org/interviews/whitehurst.htm, retrieved on 11 December 2007
- ^ Wren, Sebastian (1999), Phonics Rules, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL), http://www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/read07.html, retrieved on 7 July 2007
- ^ Tompkins, G. 2006. Literacy for the 21st Century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- ^ Greenberg, D. (1987) The Sudbury Valley School Experience Back to Basics.
- ^ Greenberg, D. (1987) Free at Last, The Sudbury Valley School, Chapter 5, The Other 'R's.
- ^ John Taylor Gatto (2000-20003) The Underground History of American Education - A Schoolteacher's Intimate Investigation Into The Problem Of Modern Schooling, Chapter Three - Eyeless In Gaza, The Sudbury Valley School. retrieved, November 23 2008.
External links
- Literacy at the Open Directory Project
|
|||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 30 November 2008, at 23:30.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Illiterate".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
