This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Missouri bellwether is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
The Missouri bellwether is a political phenomenon that notes that the state of Missouri has voted for the winner in every U.S. Presidential election beginning in 1904 except every 52-year intervals (in 1956 and in 2008). Prior to the 2008 elections, Lincoln County, Missouri was said to be the only bellwether county in a bellwether state.1 Missouri is also considered a bellwether of U.S. views on hot-button social issues such as stem cell research,2 school vouchers,3 and same-sex marriage.45 Some economists also consider the state a bellwether for economic trends such as consumer confidence and unemployment.6
Contents |
Political history
Between 1904 and 2008, Missouri's electoral votes went to the person who became President of the United States with two exceptions. The first was in 1956 during the Dwight Eisenhower landslide, when Missouri went to neighboring Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson. The second was the 2008 victory of Barack Obama, where Missouri slightly leaned towards Sen. John McCain. Missouri's accuracy in voting with the national consensus includes the "too close to call" elections of 1948, 1960, 1976, and 2000. (Although in 2000 Missouri indicated only the winner of the electoral vote, not the winner of the popular vote.)
In 2006, Missouri's bellwether status gained renewed attention because of the 2006 Senate race between incumbent Republican Senator Jim Talent and Democratic State Auditor Claire McCaskill, which was considered vital to which party controls Congress.78 Additionally, Missouri had a ballot measure, Missouri Amendment Two, regarding stem cell research that drew national attention as an indicator of mainstream sentiment towards this controversial issue.9 On Election Day 2006, both McCaskill and Amendment 2 narrowly received majority support among Missouri voters. The victories of McCaskill and five other Democratic colleagues allowed their party to regain power in the U.S. Senate.10
During the 2008 presidential election, some analysts and correspondentswho? said Missouri shows the ideological ranges for each party (e.g., liberal and moderate democrats, evangelicals, etc.). In the primaries, the state voted for the presidential candidates who eventually secured their parties' nomination: John McCain (Republican) and Barack Obama (Democratic).
Possible causes
| This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (October 2008) |
| This article may contain original research or unverified claims. Please improve the article by adding references. See the talk page for details. (October 2008) |
Location and demographics are most often cited as the cause of Missouri's bellwether status. The Chicago Tribune calls Missouri the "bellwether state that almost exactly mirrors the demographic, economic and political makeup of the nation."11 A microcosm of the country's current political makeup, Missouri has its two Blue "coasts" of St. Louis and Kansas City with Red middle and southern areas (see Red states and blue states).
Since 1980, the mean center of U.S. population of the United States (which has been moving steadily westward) has been in Missouri (currently in Phelps County). Missouri is in the center of the country, distant from the coast and the national borders. It shares a border with three Southern states, three Plains states, and two Midwestern states.
Missouri has a mix of urban, suburban and rural populations. St. Louis considers itself the furthest west of the eastern cities while Kansas City considers itself the furthest east of the western cities.
Missouri was a border state in the American Civil War. After the state legislature voted to secede, it was represented by competing factions in both the Confederate and Union governments. Missourians fought on both sides of the conflict, and the state was the site of repeated military clashes throughout the war.
Continued bellwether status?
One of the more important national phenomena that has not had the same impact in Missouri as in the rest of the country is the influx of immigrants, particularly Latinos. Analysts and journalists in recent times have pointed to states like Ohio12, New Mexico13, Pennsylvania14, and California15 as more accurate political and cultural bellwethers. As for Missouri, Slate columnist Chris Suellentrop has said that the state "isn't so much a bellwether as it is a weathervane: It doesn't swing the country, the country swings it..." and that Missouri is a better indicator of whether a trend is mainstream than of what the next new trend will be.16 In 2008 however, Missouri very narrowly voted for Republican John McCain despite a large electoral college victory for Democrat Barack Obama and nationwide dissatisfaction with the Bush administration. As a result, its accuracy rate for the last 26 presidential elections is now about 92.6%. Ohio has an even longer record of voting for the winning candidate; it has voted for the winner of every presidential election since 1896 except for 1944 and 1960. Nevada has been carried by the winner in every presidential election since 1912, except just once in 1976. Also, New Mexico has voted for the winner of every presidential election from its statehood in 1912 except in the 1976 and 2000 elections.
See also
- United States presidential election in Missouri, 2008
- United States presidential election in Missouri, 1956
- United States presidential elections in Missouri
- As Maine goes, so goes the nation
- Missouri demographics
References
- David Brian Robertson (2004) "Bellwether Politics in Missouri," The Forum: Vol. 2: No. 3, Article 2.
Footnotes
- ^ Missouri Bellwether County Undecided This Election, an October 17, 2008 article from the NPR website
- ^ Stltoday.com Churches joining stem cell showdown
- ^ The Heritage Foundation
- ^ WorldMag.Com Missouri No-Compromise
- ^ The Advocate Show-Me Discrimination
- ^ Business Perspectives The Missouri economy: an overview
- ^ Washington Post President Comes to Aid of Vulnerable Senator in Missouri, Seen as Bellwether State
- ^ US News and World Report Missouri Two-step
- ^ Pam Solo and Gail Pressberg Stem Cell Research Is Winning Mainstream Issue in 2006 Voting
- ^ Michael Gawenda America votes for change
- ^ Chicago Tribune Bush Leads in Bellwether State
- ^ Fox News Ohio Special Election Could Be '06 Bellwether
- ^ CNN Showdown States: New Mexico
- ^ Franklin & Marshall The Pennsylvania Paradox
- ^ Time Magazine The Coming of the Minority Majority
- ^ Swingers: A guide to the swing state Missouri
External links
- A Mirror for the Nation
- USA Today profile of the phenomenon
- Bellwether states and counties from 1960 to 1996
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 2 January 2009, at 00:59.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Missouri bellwether".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
