Theil index

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Theil index is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Related Sponsors

BM Pharmacy Generic pharmaceuticals at unbeatable prices. Insomnia, men's health, hair health, pain control. bmpharmacy.com
Online Pharmacy Carisoprodol, tadalafil, sildenafil, vardenafil and more... xlpharmacy.com
MedBasket.com Discreet. Inexpensive. Fast shipping. Great selection. What more can we say? medbasket.com
Frugalmed 2000 reasons to shop with us first. frugalmed.com
Ads by Tiva

The Theil index,1 derived by econometrician Henri Theil, is a statistic used to measure economic inequality.

Contents

Mathematics

The formula2 is

T_1=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N \left( \frac{x_i}{\overline{x}} \cdot \ln{\frac{x_i}{\overline{x}}} \right)
T_0=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N \left( \ln{\frac{\overline{x}}{x_i}} \right)

where xi is the income of the ith person, \overline{x}= \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N x_i is the mean income, and N is the number of people. The first term inside the sum can be considered the individual's share of aggregate income, and the second term is that person's income relative to the mean. If everyone has the same (i.e., mean) income, then the index is 0. If one person has all the income, then the index is ln N.

The Theil index is derived from Shannon's measure of information entropy. Letting T be the Theil index and S be Shannon's information entropy measure,

T=\ln(N)-S. \,

Shannon derived his entropy measure in terms of the probability of an event occurring. This can be interpreted in the Theil index as the probability a dollar drawn at random from the population came from a specific individual. This is the same as the first term, the individual's share of aggregate income.

With reference to information theory3, Theil's measure is a redundancy rather than an entropy. The redundancy of a system at a given time is the difference between its maximum entropy and its present entropy at that time.4.

The two Theil Indices T1 and T0 are special measures provided by the "generalized entropy class"5 with ε = 1 and ε = 0.

TT und TL

From T1 again two variants can be derived: TT applies e.g. to the distribution of money to groups of people and TL applies e.g. to the distribution of groups of people to money.

Application of the Theil index

Theil's index takes an equal distribution for reference which is similar to distributions in statistical physics. An index for an actual system is an actual redundancy, that is, the difference between maximum entropy and actual entropy of that system.

Theil's measure can be converted4 by the operation 1 − e − T into one of the indexes of Anthony Barnes Atkinson, where ε may or may not be used to introduce an inequality aversion factor into the formula, with ε = 1 being the default. The result of the conversion also has been called normalized Theil index6.

James E. Foster7 used such a measure to replace the Gini coefficient in Amartya Sen's welfare function W=f(income,inequality). The income e.g. is the average income for individuals in a group of income earners. Thus, Foster's welfare function can be computed directly from the Theil index T, if the conversion is included into the computation of the average per capita welfare function:

W = \overline\text{income} \cdot {e^{-T}}.\,

Using the "Theil-L" index TL (see below) for T in that formula yields results similar to using the Atkinson index for computing the welfare function.

Theil index and Hoover index

For the income distributions provided by the The World Income Inequality Database (2007-05)8 the difference between their symmetrized Theil indices and their Hoover indices are plotted over their respective Gini indices. The difference illustrates the impact of the different inequalities on the information generated by them. Negative values occur for Theil indices, which are smaller than the respective Hoover indices.

For the following formulas, a notation9 is used, where the amount N of quantiles only appears as upper border of summations. Thus, inequities can be computed for quantiles with different widths Ai. For example, Ei could be the income in the quantile #i and Ai could be the amount (absolute or relative) of earners in the quantile #i. Etotal then would be the sum of incomes of all N quantiles and Atotal would be the sum of the income earners in all N quantiles.

Theil index

Computation of the (asymmetric) Theil index T 10:

TT

A first variant of the Theil index refers to E as a base. Being a redundancy, the formula describes the margin between the maximum entropy (on the left side of the minus symbol) related to a completely equal distribution e.g. of people to resources and the actual entropy (on the left side of the minus symbol) related to the actual distribution of people to resources:

T_T = \ln{\frac{{A}_\text{total}}{{E}_\text{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{E}_i} \ln{\frac{{A}_i}{{E}_i}}}{{E}_\text{total}}.

With normalized data, E'i = Ei / Etotal and A'i = Ai / Atotal would apply. This would simplify the formula:

\color{Gray} T_T = 0 - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{E}'_i} \ln{\frac{{A}'_i}{{E}'_i}}}{1} = \sum_{i=1}^N {{E}'_i} \ln{\frac{{E}'_i}{{A}'_i}}

TL

The second variant of the Theil index refers to A as a base11. Being a redundancy as in the previous case, this formula describes the margin between the maximum entropy related to a completely equal distribution e.g. of resources to people and the actual entropy related to the actual distribution of resources to people:

T_L = \ln{\frac{{E}_\text{total}}{{A}_\text{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{A}_i} \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}}}{{A}_\text{total}}.

With normalized data, A'i = Ai / Atotal and E'i = Ei / Etotal would apply. This would simplify the formula:

\color{Gray} T_L = 0 - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{A}'_i} \ln{\frac{{E}'_i}{{A}'_i}}}{1} = \sum_{i=1}^N {{A}'_i} \ln{\frac{{A}'_i}{{E}'_i}}

Ts

Computation of the symmetrized Theil index Ts:

T_s = \frac{1}{2} \left( \ln{\frac{{A}_\text{total}}{{E}_\text{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{E}_i} \ln{\frac{{A}_i}{{E}_i}}}{{E}_\text{total}} + \ln{\frac{{E}_\text{total}}{{A}_\text{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{A}_i} \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}}}{{A}_\text{total}} \right).

This leads to:

T_s = {\frac{1}{2}} \sum_{i=1}^N \color{Blue} \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}} \left( \color{Black} {\frac{{E}_i}{{E}_\text{total}}} - {\frac{{A}_i}{{A}_\text{total}}} \color{Blue} \right) \color{Black}.

Hoover index

The formula for the Hoover index H is:

H = {\frac{1}{2}} \sum_{i=1}^N \color{Blue} \left| \color{Black} {\frac{{E}_i}{{E}_\text{total}}} - {\frac{{A}_i}{{A}_\text{total}}} \color{Blue} \right| \color{Black}.

Difference between both indices

The difference between the Hoover index and the symmetrized Theil index only is the operation on the deviation from equity Ei / Etotal − Ai / Atotal.

A comparison of the Hoover index and the Theil index gives sense to both indices:

  • For the Hoover index, the relative deviations in each quantile are summed up. Each deviation is weighted by its own sign (+1 or −1). Thus, the Hoover index is the most simple inequality measure. It has no normative foundations and does not refer to any models from physics or information theory.
  • For the symmetrized Theil index, the relative deviations in each quantile are summed up as well. But each deviation is weighted by its relative information weight. Thus, the Theil index is an indicator not only for the plain relative inequality, it also attempts to indicate how much attention inequality can get.

When using the formulas for the symmetrized Theil index and the Hoover index in spreadsheet computations, the differences as well as the similarities between both inequality metrics become obvious.

Pareto principle

Understanding the range of the Theil index

The property of not being a measure with a closed scale between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%), like in case of the Gini index, is an acceptance barrier, which to overcome seems to be difficult even for famous scientists: Theil's index "is not a measure that is exactly overflowing with intuitive sense," wrote Amartya Sen in a book7, in which his co-author James Foster used the Theil index nevertheless. One way to overcome this obstacle is provided by the normalized6 Theil index Tnormalized = 1 − e − T.

The alternative is, not to normalize the index and to use it as it is due to an interesting property of that index: For resource distributions described by only two quantiles, the Theil index is 0 for 50:50 distributions and reaches 1 at 82:1812, which is very close to a distribution often referred to as "Pareto Principle". Higher inequities yield Theil indices above 1. This leads to a comparison, which yields to intuition:

Illustration of the relation between Theil index T and the Hoover index H for societies devides into two quantiles, where a share of A dollars is assigned to a share of B people and a share of B dollars is assigned to a share of A people, with A+B=1 (e.g. “Pareto Principle” with A=0.8 and B=0.2). For societies grouped in such a manner, the Theil index, the Theil index with swapped parameters and the symmetrized Theil index are equal to each other. Also the Gini Index G is equal to the Hoover Index H.
  • The Gini index is 0 if the distribution is completely equal. It is 1 at maximum inequality.
  • The Theil index
    • is 0 for an inequality represented by a 50:50 distribution (the distribution is completely equal),
    • is 0.5 for an inequality represented by a 74:26 distribution,
    • is 1 for an inequality represented by a 82:1812 distribution (which is slightly above the equivalent to the frequently cited 80:20 distribution),
    • is 2 for an inequality represented by a 92:8 distribution and
    • is 4 for an inequality represented by a 98:2 distribution.

Computing the Theil index from an A:B distribution

A Theil index T can be found for any A:B distribution in societies, which are split into two quantiles. The height A of the 1st quantile is the height B of the 2nd quantile. The width B of the 1st quantile is the width B of the 2nd quantile. First the Gini index G (which in this case is similar to the Hoover index) is calculated from the A:B distribution (the range of the variables is 0 to 1 instead of 0% to 100%):

G=H=\left|2A-1 \right|=\left|2B-1 \right|

Then

T_T =T_L =T_s = 2G \, \operatorname{artanh} \left( G \right).

Reverse computation

The reverse computation is a recursion13:

  • Initiation:
\displaystyle G = T
  • Repeat the following two operatios until the error \left| 2G \, \operatorname{artanh} \left( G \right) - T \right| is small enough:
\displaystyle G_0 = G
\displaystyle G = \mathrm{tanh} \left( \frac{T}{G+G_0} \right)
  • Change to the format of the "pareto-principle":
\displaystyle A:B = \left( \frac{1+G}{2} \right): \left( \frac{1-G}{2} \right)

Decomposability

One of the advantages of the Theil index is that it is a weighted average of inequality within subgroups, plus inequality among those subgroups. For example, inequality within the United States is the average inequality within each state, weighted by state income, plus the inequality among states.

If for the Theil-T index the population is divided into m certain subgroups and si is the income share of group i, TTi is the Theil-T index for that subgroup, and \overline{x}_i is the average income in group i, then the Theil index is

T_T = \sum_{i=1}^m s_i T_{T_i} + \sum_{i=1}^m s_i \ln{\frac{\overline{x}_i}{\overline{x}}}

The formula for the Theil-L index is:

T_L = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i=1}^m T_{L_i} + \frac{1}{m} \sum_{i=1}^m \ln{\frac{\overline{x}_i}{\overline{x}}}
Map of economic inequality in the United States using the Theil Index. A high positive theil index indicates more income than population while a negative value shows more population than income. A value of zero shows equality between population and income.
Note: This image is not the Theil Index in each area of the United States, but of contributions to the US Theil Index by each area (the Theil Index is always positive, individual contributions to the Theil Index may be negative or positive).

If the aggregated groups have different amount of members, these formulas apply:

T_T = \ln{\frac{{A}_\mathrm{total}}{{E}_\mathrm{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{E}_i} \left( \ln{\frac{{A}_i}{{E}_i}} - T_{T_i}\right)}{{E}_\mathrm{total}}
T_L = \ln{\frac{{E}_\mathrm{total}}{{A}_\mathrm{total}}} - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{A}_i} \left( \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}} - T_{L_i}\right)}{{A}_\mathrm{total}}
T_s = {\frac{1}{2}} \sum_{i=1}^N \ln \frac{E_i}{A_i} \left( \frac{{E}_i}{E_\text{total}} - \frac{A_i}{A_\text{total}} \right) + \frac{{E}_i}{E_\text{total}} T_{T_i} + \frac{{A}_i}{A_\text{total}} T_{L_i}

The decomposability is a property of the Theil index which the more popular Gini coefficient does not offer. The Gini coefficient is more intuitive to many people since it is based on the Lorenz curve. However, it is not easily decomposable like the Theil.

Welfare function

Amartya Sen proposed to use the Gini Index to compute a welfare function which would yield the per capita income earned by anyone who is randomly selected from a population within which the total income is distributed inequally:

W_\mathrm{Gini} = \overline{\text{Income}} \cdot \left( 1-G \right)

Later James E. Foster proposed as co author in the second edition of Amartya Sen's On Economic Inequality14 written together with Amartya Sen to use one of the entropy inequality measures from Atkinson. Due to the relation between that measure and the Theil index, Fosters proposel can be implemented by this formula:

W_\mathrm{Theil-L} = \overline{\text{Income}} \cdot \mathrm{e}^{-T_L} = \frac {E_\mathrm{total}}{A_\mathrm{total}} \text{ } \mathrm{e}^{-T_L}

The same welfare function can be computed from the right term of the Theil-L formula:

W_\mathrm{Theil-L} = \mathrm{e}^{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{A}_i} \left( \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}} - T_{L_i}\right)}{{A}_\mathrm{total}}} = \prod_{i=1}^N \left( \frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i} \text{ } \mathrm{e}^{-T_{L_i}} \right)^{\frac{{A}_i}{{A}_\mathrm{total}}}

(As the Theil index is decomposable, in this formula as well as in the following formulas Theil indices also can be specified for the individual groups. But usually that index is not known. In that case its value is zero.)

For the Welfare function, the Theil-L index is used. It yields an per capita income which is close to the lower end of middle class incomes. The inverse value of a welfare function computed with the Theil-T index yields an income, which is close to the upper end of middle class incomes:

W^{-1}_\mathrm{Theil-T} = \overline{\text{Income}} \cdot \mathrm{e}^{T_T} = \frac {E_\mathrm{total}}{A_\mathrm{total}} \text{ } \mathrm{e}^{T_T} = \mathrm{e}^{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^N {{E}_i} \left( \ln{\frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i}} + T_{T_i}\right)}{{E}_\mathrm{total}}} = \prod_{i=1}^N \left( \frac{{E}_i}{{A}_i} \text{ } \mathrm{e}^{T_{T_i}} \right)^{\frac{{E}_i}{{E}_\mathrm{total}}}

Example: The average monthly per capita income before taxes in Germany (2001)15 was 2800€. A welfare function with a Theil-L index of 0.578 yields 1570€ per month. Using a Theil-T index of 0.520, the inverse value of the monthly welfare function was 4700€. In comparison, tarif agreements between the labor union and the employers of the electrical and metal industry in Bavaria cover the salary range between 1649€ und 4000€</ref>. This example does not use welfare functions to define the bounds of middle class incomes. It just puts the welfare functions into relation to real world incomes.

\displaystyle W_\mathrm{Theil-L} is one out of several possible incomes which could be earned by a person, who randomly is selected from a population with a certain distribution of incomes. Similar to the median, this welfare function marks the income, which a randomly selected person is most likely to have. This income will be smaller than the average per capita income.

\displaystyle W^{-1}_\mathrm{Theil-T} is one out of several possible incomes which could be part of the income to which a Euro belongs, which randomly is selected from the sum of all incomes, which are inequally distributed. This welfare function marks the income, which a randomly selected Euro most likely belongs to. This income will be larger than the average per capita income.

See also

References

  1. ^ Introduction to the Theil index from the University of Texas
  2. ^ http://economicsbulletin.vanderbilt.edu/2008/volume15/EB-07O10036A.pdf
  3. ^ ISO/IEC DIS 2382-16:1996 (Information theory)
  4. ^ a b http://www.poorcity.richcity.org (Redundancy, Entropy and Inequality Measures)
  5. ^ James E. Foster im Annex A.4.1 (S.142) von Amartya Sen: On Economic Inequality, 1973/1997
  6. ^ a b Juana Domínguez-Domínguez, José Javier Núñez-Velázquez: The Evolution of Economic Inequality in the EU Countries During the Nineties, 2005
  7. ^ a b James E. Foster and Amartya Sen, 1996, On Economic Inequality, expanded edition with annexe, ISBN 0-19-828193-5
  8. ^ UNU-WIDER : Database (WIID)
  9. ^ The notation using E and A follows the notation of a small calculus published by Lionnel Maugis: Inequality Measures in Mathematical Programming for the Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with En-Route Capacities (für IFORS 96), 1996
  10. ^ (1) The first part of the formula is the maximum entropy of the E-A-system. The second part (after the minus symbol) is the real entropy of the E-A-system at a certain time. Such a difference is called redundancy (ISO/IEC DIS 2382-16, information theory).
    (2) This version of Theil's formula allows to process quantiles with different widths Ai. N only serves as summation index.
    (3) Besides mathematical comparison of this formula to the formulas found in many calculi, you can compare the results 1A and 1B yielded by this formula with the examples 1A and 1B given in The Theoretical Basics of Popular Inequality Measures (Travis Hale, University of Texas Inequality Project, 2003).
  11. ^ Elhanan Helpman: The Mystery of Economic Growth, 2004, ISBN 0-674-01572-X (See page 150 for a similar computation of TT and TL by two formulas.)
  12. ^ a b Example: 82.4% of the people own 17.6% of all ressources and 17.6% own 82.4% of all ressources. For computation see also http://www.poorcity.richcity.org/calculator/?quantiles=82.4,17.6|17.6,82.4
  13. ^ A better and complete algorithm is explained in the German Wikipedia using the Python scripting language. The script also is available with comments in English.
  14. ^ James E. Foster und Amartya Sen, 1996, On Economic Inequality, expanded edition with annexe, ISBN 0-19-828193-5
  15. ^ Online Calculator: Distribution of incomes (before taxation) in Germany, 2001

External links

  • Software:
    • Free Online Calculator computes the Gini Coefficient, plots the Lorenz curve, and computes many other measures of concentration for any dataset
    • Free Calculator: Online and downloadable scripts (Python and Lua) for Atkinson, Gini, and Hoover inequalities
    • Users of the R data analysis software can install the "ineq" package which allows for computation of a variety of inequality indices including Gini, Atkinson, Theil.
    • A MATLAB Inequality Package, including code for computing Gini, Atkinson, Theil indexes and for plotting the Lorenz Curve. Many examples are available.

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 29 November 2008, at 09:13.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Theil index".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.