This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (legal) is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:
Related Sponsors
| This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Editors should follow it, except where common sense and the occasional exception will improve an article. Before editing this page, please make sure that your revision reflects consensus. |
Contents |
Templates
- Use the WikiProject Law template (when it's been created!)
- Use the {{law-stub}} template for law related stubs
For specific areas of law...
- {{Template:ContractLaw}}
- {{Template:TortLaw}}
- {{Template:PropertyLaw}}
- {{Template:CrimLaw}}
- {{Template:EvidenceLaw}}
General considerations
- Wikipedia is not a guide for law students – try Wikibooks if you want to write a textbook
- Aim to provide an overview to an international lay audience
- Provide some depth and detail worthy of an encyclopedia
- Use plain language
- Keep in mind that there are several styles of legal system (civil law, sharia law, common law, customary law). No one style is more or less worthy of description than the others.
- Within a given style of legal system, the law may have evolved in divergent ways. No one development is more or less worthy of description than the others.
- Because the law differs between jurisdictions, when starting or making a big contribution to an article, state in the article's discussion page what jurisdiction you are writing about. Try to incorporate a comparative perspective, if possible.
- Use {{lang}} to mark up Latin words and phrases, thus: {{lang|la|Nolo contendere}}.
Article contents
Broad areas of law
- Articles about broad areas of law, like Tort, should contain an overview of the law as it stands, its development.
- Avoid becoming overly technical
Writing about particular cases
- Start with a summary why the case is encyclopedic. What is its impact on society, what makes it stand out from all the other cases heard this year?
- Summary in fairly plain language, for a lay audience, possibly followed by a more detailed introduction. For those who do not read the whole decision, this is sufficient for a start.
- The legal details, for those who need to better understand the legal issues involved and how the court arrived at its decision.
Writing about particular concepts
- Provide a framework for the concept. E.g. - Contextualise Detinue as an intentional Tort against property.
- Link to landmark cases which define the concept
Citation
- Case names are italicised, as in the Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation article.
- Try to link to cases on Worldlii, Bailii, Austlii [1], or similar free resource (instead of a pay-to-use resource, or internet news articles).
Wikipedia content modification information:
- This page was last modified on 5 September 2008, at 09:47.
Wikipedia Authorship and Review
Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.
Wikipedia Usage Guidelines
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Manual of Style (legal)".
The URL for this specific entry is:
All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
