Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics

This MedLibrary.org supplementary page on Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics is provided directly from the open source Wikipedia as a service to our readers. Please see the note below on authorship of this content, as well as the Wikipedia usage guidelines. To search for other content from our encyclopedia supplement, please use the form below:

Shortcut:
WP:CORE
Wikipedia 1.0
Projects
(talk)(FAQ)
WP 1.0 bot list
(talk)(stats)
Selection bot(talk)
Version 0.7 bot selection

VersionIDsCopyedit (t)
Version 0.7 feedback

IRC channel (IRC)

Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.7 release
(manual selection) (t)
(Nominations) (t)
[You can help]
"Selection" project (Talk)

2008 schools selection


CORE TOPICS
CORE SUPPLEMENT

Core topics - 1,000
(Talk) (COTF) (bot)

TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
Schools project (Talk)|
WORK VIA WIKI
PROJECTS
(talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)

Static content subcom.

The Core Topics subproject of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team is intended to identify and work toward improvement of the most important articles (realizing that "importance" is subjective). For the time being, our work is limited to about 150 articles, which are listed with comments in the table below. A supplementary list, similar in size, has been created to cover some other important subjects.

Contents

How you can help

If you're interested in helping, here are some good places to start.

Individually
  • Work on any article listed in the tree and update its status if needed. Especially, use the article status summary as a guide. The summary lists the best and worst of the core topics. (The "Start Class" topics are more than stubs but often need substantial work).
Collaborations

Background

This was begun December 4, 2004, by popular demand, more or less, to be a list of about 150 core subjects that would go in a "release" version of Wikipedia.

The list is small to be tightly focused. Articles on individual countries are core topics, but beyond the scope of this list because there are so many and their value is clear. Biographies are beyond the scope of this list, because there are multitudes and their value when considered individually is too subjective. Other contenders for core articles include articles on the English language, timelines, maps and any reference material.

Article status summary

Elite Eight
Article Quality Comments
Geography B
History B Badly organized, no in-line citations, POV issues
Humanities B Lacks information.
Mathematics A
Natural science* Start Needs to be expanded and referenced mainly.
Science* B Lacking in inline citations.
Social sciences Start
Personal life Start Needs a lead section split off, completely unreferenced.
Technology B Getting there

*Either Natural science or Science should be selected.

Continents

(including Oceania)

Featured Articles
Good Articles -- none
Fair quality
Short

Only about eight screens.

Only about five screens.

General

Tree

Culture and society, 15
Earth, 16
Humanities, 24
Life science and medicine, 19

Mathematics, 6: Algebra B | Geometry B | Mathematics GA/A | Number A | Statistics B | Calculus ?

Physical science, 29
Social science, 22
Technology, 18

Members

Similar lists

Subpages

Wikipedia content modification information:

  • This page was last modified on 23 November 2008, at 18:49.

Wikipedia Authorship and Review

Wikipedia content provided here is not reviewed directly by MedLibrary.org. Wikipedia content is authored by an open community of volunteers and is not produced by or in any way affiliated with MedLibrary.org.

Wikipedia Usage Guidelines

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics".

The URL for this specific entry is:

All Wikipedia text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details). Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.